Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
德索托的理论成功指导了秘鲁的改革，当制度门槛降低、资产进入资本体系，市场活力逐渐恢复，改革红利在21世纪初集中释放。
// 桶内用插入排序（小数组效率高）。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
«Да избавит нас Господь от неминуемой беды!»Редких цикад веками считали опасным бедствием. Мир ждет их нашествие впервые за 17 лет7 апреля 2021
。旺商聊官方下载是该领域的重要参考
——“功成不必在我，功成必定有我”，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
Updates to the leaderboard are welcome via pull request.